Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Clinton's counsel brought on to current staff....
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Riley" data-source="post: 2602304" data-attributes="member: 29196"><p>Another couple of items likely to be ignored by the ever vigilant press...</p><p></p><p>First, who knew things being "too onerous" was an automatic exemption from FOIA? News to me. I wonder who gets to determine the level of effort to which a request must rise before the clause is invoked? Oh, the same people who don't want to fulfill the legal request in the first place! Of course, brilliant!!</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_1_today.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_1_today.html</a></p><p></p><p>Second, turns out Lois L had a couple of blackberry's, at least on of which was "destroyed" wink wink, nudge nudge, months after the controversy broke and congressional investigation was underway.</p><p> </p><p>In another brilliant, unassumingly random act, conducted without any internal correspondence or direction, there was apparently, no effort by any (insert appropriate agency here) employee to save or recover any data from the device. </p><p></p><p>You don't say.... Seems file boxes in the closet is not quite the same defense that it was in the pre digital age. Who could have guessed that?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_2_today.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_2_today.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Riley, post: 2602304, member: 29196"] Another couple of items likely to be ignored by the ever vigilant press... First, who knew things being "too onerous" was an automatic exemption from FOIA? News to me. I wonder who gets to determine the level of effort to which a request must rise before the clause is invoked? Oh, the same people who don't want to fulfill the legal request in the first place! Of course, brilliant!! [url]http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_1_today.html[/url] Second, turns out Lois L had a couple of blackberry's, at least on of which was "destroyed" wink wink, nudge nudge, months after the controversy broke and congressional investigation was underway. In another brilliant, unassumingly random act, conducted without any internal correspondence or direction, there was apparently, no effort by any (insert appropriate agency here) employee to save or recover any data from the device. You don't say.... Seems file boxes in the closet is not quite the same defense that it was in the pre digital age. Who could have guessed that? [url]http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/irs_coverup_revelation_2_today.html[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Clinton's counsel brought on to current staff....
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom