Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Colt Commander XSE 1911 Lightweight SS
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 806755" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>I don't know about the Colt quality, but my 4" all steel Kimber is a SOLID chunk of steel. It IS noticeable compared to carrying a Glock. The LW frame would help that. It's not undoable, or really uncomfortable, just less so than the lighter guns. I'll agree that barrel length makes little difference for behind the hip carry.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't consider the newer model Kimbers worth the premium they demand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 806755, member: 423"] I don't know about the Colt quality, but my 4" all steel Kimber is a SOLID chunk of steel. It IS noticeable compared to carrying a Glock. The LW frame would help that. It's not undoable, or really uncomfortable, just less so than the lighter guns. I'll agree that barrel length makes little difference for behind the hip carry. I wouldn't consider the newer model Kimbers worth the premium they demand. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Colt Commander XSE 1911 Lightweight SS
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom