Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Communications ...***
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 2628910" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>No argument here...I'd never advocate <em>interference</em> with the network (unless the network was being used by government lapdogs during a hostile .gov crackdown of course <img src="/images/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" />). I was just getting a chuckle out of the vigilante HAM-er concept. </p><p></p><p>If someone is not afraid of the FCC/Feds and using the network without a license...they probably are not too concerned about some other HAM licensee tracking them down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 2628910, member: 42"] No argument here...I'd never advocate [I]interference[/I] with the network (unless the network was being used by government lapdogs during a hostile .gov crackdown of course ;)). I was just getting a chuckle out of the vigilante HAM-er concept. If someone is not afraid of the FCC/Feds and using the network without a license...they probably are not too concerned about some other HAM licensee tracking them down. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Communications ...***
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom