Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Concealed carry in Indian casino?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1237180" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>You might really want to check those opinions. All that the Supreme Court said in Heller and McDonald is that the Second Amendment protects is the right to own a handgun for purposes of self defense in the home. All other restrictions against the right to keep and bear arms are "presumtively valid" until such restriction has gone through the rigors of Due Process.</p><p></p><p>That's why the new Chicago ordinance says that you can possess one handgun in your home for self defense provided it is not transported outside of the home. Makes it kind of difficult to legally get one home, but that law is presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court says otherwise.</p><p></p><p>I've said it before and I'll say it again, Heller and McDonald were decisions <em>against</em> the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1237180, member: 5151"] You might really want to check those opinions. All that the Supreme Court said in Heller and McDonald is that the Second Amendment protects is the right to own a handgun for purposes of self defense in the home. All other restrictions against the right to keep and bear arms are "presumtively valid" until such restriction has gone through the rigors of Due Process. That's why the new Chicago ordinance says that you can possess one handgun in your home for self defense provided it is not transported outside of the home. Makes it kind of difficult to legally get one home, but that law is presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court says otherwise. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Heller and McDonald were decisions [I]against[/I] the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Concealed carry in Indian casino?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom