Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Conflicted.... Card #22
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Johnjosiah" data-source="post: 2592403" data-attributes="member: 8177"><p>If they are good leader they will take the opinions of others into the process of decision making. Typically even if there is a group of decision makers there is usually one person who dominates the process and pushes their agenda forward. The group concept just makes it seem more acceptable. I'm just cutting out the extra BS to have one person. It's not like a group would want to just pick some random person. It needs to be some one well respected and trusted. It doesn't matter the type of government it is no more tasteful for a council to hand out lashes to ones wife than a single dictator. </p><p></p><p>As far as beating women and children, I don't think there is room for this in any civilized society. There are some crimes (murder, rape, treason) that should have the same punishment regardless of genitalia. Most errors/crimes in my opinion need to have the option of different punishment. I don't want little Billy to think it is okay to beat women and children thus, I don't think the "state" should condone it either. But, little Billy needs to understand consequences. Extra latrine duty would suck too. I would rather takes some licks than spend 3 days with regular + extra duty. </p><p></p><p>Note: I have no problem with parents spanking their children. I have spanked my own and never had a regret. A couple quick swats the back of a 2 year olds legs tends to work great when they are very out of line.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Johnjosiah, post: 2592403, member: 8177"] If they are good leader they will take the opinions of others into the process of decision making. Typically even if there is a group of decision makers there is usually one person who dominates the process and pushes their agenda forward. The group concept just makes it seem more acceptable. I'm just cutting out the extra BS to have one person. It's not like a group would want to just pick some random person. It needs to be some one well respected and trusted. It doesn't matter the type of government it is no more tasteful for a council to hand out lashes to ones wife than a single dictator. As far as beating women and children, I don't think there is room for this in any civilized society. There are some crimes (murder, rape, treason) that should have the same punishment regardless of genitalia. Most errors/crimes in my opinion need to have the option of different punishment. I don't want little Billy to think it is okay to beat women and children thus, I don't think the "state" should condone it either. But, little Billy needs to understand consequences. Extra latrine duty would suck too. I would rather takes some licks than spend 3 days with regular + extra duty. Note: I have no problem with parents spanking their children. I have spanked my own and never had a regret. A couple quick swats the back of a 2 year olds legs tends to work great when they are very out of line. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Preppers' Corner
Conflicted.... Card #22
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom