Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Conservatives Go to War Against NRA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JB Books" data-source="post: 1179511" data-attributes="member: 6889"><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: Red">JB likes to keep you informws</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Conservatives are balking at a deal cut between the National Rifle Association and Congressional Democrats, who crafted an exception for the NRA in planned campaign-finance reform legislation. The deal was meant to recruit the NRA into gathering Republicans into supporting the legislation. But conservative pundits are fuming that the NRA, one of the most powerful interest groups on the right, would get into bed with Democrats. Here's what they're saying.</p><p></p><p>NRA Board Member: This Was a Terrible Idea Cleta Mitchell writes in the Washington Post, "For its part, the NRA -- on whose board of directors I serve -- rather than holding steadfastly to its historic principles of defending the Constitution and continuing its noble fight against government regulation of political speech instead opted for a political deal borne of self-interest in exchange for 'neutrality' from the legislation's requirements. In doing so, the NRA has, sadly, affirmed the notion ... that First Amendment protections are subject to negotiation. The Second Amendment surely cannot be far behind."</p><p>'Unprincipled' NRA is 'Arrogant and Elitist' The Wall Street Journal scoffs, "Look who's arrogant and elitist now. ... So much for defending the little guy against the fat cats." This deal "reveals an NRA that is unprincipled and will be weaker for it in the long run."</p><p>NRA Sells Out Own Members National Review's Hans A. von Spakovsky sighs, "the NRA has apparently sold out." Von Spakovsky writes, "the NRA may end up providing the lobbying grease that allows this noxious and partisan piece of legislation to slide through the House, something that I seriously doubt most of the individual members of the NRA (who are strong believers in the First Amendment as well as the Second) would agree with."</p><p>NRA Betrays America The American Thinker's Mark Fitzgibbons sheds crocodile tears. "Disappointment does not come from opponents; it comes from friends," he writes. "The NRA's friends told it that it was on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of this American moment. The NRA, however, spurned its friends, its members, and ultimately, freedom."</p><p>NRA Puts Itself First, Free Speech Second Erick Erickson fumes that the NRA was willing to support the campaign finance bill at all. He asks, "how then does it help the second amendment to have every other political organization bound by this new anti-free speech legislation except the NRA? The answer is that it does not help the second amendment. It helps the NRA. And the NRA is perfectly happy to use Democrats to acquire for itself monopoly status. The NRA wants to make itself the indispensable man on the second amendment."</p><p>NRA Is Like Nazi Germany? RedState's Erick Erickson goes there. Referencing the fact that the NRA's deal appears to have drawn negative attention to the bill, he writes, "I'm sure the NRA will claim that was their strategy all along. Kind of like Germany's strategy was really to lose both wars." Erickson, listing the NRA's many sins against conservative Republican politics, urges his readers to instead support Gun Owners of America.</p><p>The Debate</p><p>Guns and Free Speech The Editors, The Wall Street Journal </p><p>Some Bad News Hans A. von Spakovksy, National Review </p><p>NRA Sells Out Freedom Erick Erickson, RedState </p><p>Deal With The Devil Mark Fitzgibbons, The American Thinker </p><p>Selling Out Cleta Mitchell, The Washington Post</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JB Books, post: 1179511, member: 6889"] [SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]JB likes to keep you informws[/COLOR][/SIZE] Conservatives are balking at a deal cut between the National Rifle Association and Congressional Democrats, who crafted an exception for the NRA in planned campaign-finance reform legislation. The deal was meant to recruit the NRA into gathering Republicans into supporting the legislation. But conservative pundits are fuming that the NRA, one of the most powerful interest groups on the right, would get into bed with Democrats. Here's what they're saying. NRA Board Member: This Was a Terrible Idea Cleta Mitchell writes in the Washington Post, "For its part, the NRA -- on whose board of directors I serve -- rather than holding steadfastly to its historic principles of defending the Constitution and continuing its noble fight against government regulation of political speech instead opted for a political deal borne of self-interest in exchange for 'neutrality' from the legislation's requirements. In doing so, the NRA has, sadly, affirmed the notion ... that First Amendment protections are subject to negotiation. The Second Amendment surely cannot be far behind." 'Unprincipled' NRA is 'Arrogant and Elitist' The Wall Street Journal scoffs, "Look who's arrogant and elitist now. ... So much for defending the little guy against the fat cats." This deal "reveals an NRA that is unprincipled and will be weaker for it in the long run." NRA Sells Out Own Members National Review's Hans A. von Spakovsky sighs, "the NRA has apparently sold out." Von Spakovsky writes, "the NRA may end up providing the lobbying grease that allows this noxious and partisan piece of legislation to slide through the House, something that I seriously doubt most of the individual members of the NRA (who are strong believers in the First Amendment as well as the Second) would agree with." NRA Betrays America The American Thinker's Mark Fitzgibbons sheds crocodile tears. "Disappointment does not come from opponents; it comes from friends," he writes. "The NRA's friends told it that it was on the wrong side of this issue and on the wrong side of this American moment. The NRA, however, spurned its friends, its members, and ultimately, freedom." NRA Puts Itself First, Free Speech Second Erick Erickson fumes that the NRA was willing to support the campaign finance bill at all. He asks, "how then does it help the second amendment to have every other political organization bound by this new anti-free speech legislation except the NRA? The answer is that it does not help the second amendment. It helps the NRA. And the NRA is perfectly happy to use Democrats to acquire for itself monopoly status. The NRA wants to make itself the indispensable man on the second amendment." NRA Is Like Nazi Germany? RedState's Erick Erickson goes there. Referencing the fact that the NRA's deal appears to have drawn negative attention to the bill, he writes, "I'm sure the NRA will claim that was their strategy all along. Kind of like Germany's strategy was really to lose both wars." Erickson, listing the NRA's many sins against conservative Republican politics, urges his readers to instead support Gun Owners of America. The Debate Guns and Free Speech The Editors, The Wall Street Journal Some Bad News Hans A. von Spakovksy, National Review NRA Sells Out Freedom Erick Erickson, RedState Deal With The Devil Mark Fitzgibbons, The American Thinker Selling Out Cleta Mitchell, The Washington Post [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Conservatives Go to War Against NRA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom