Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constitutional Carry (SB 1212) on the OK House floor 4/23
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3109701" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Yes, some rights are regulate-able and can be done so by the very virtue of how they are crafted. Take freedom of speech for example. We have freedom of speech but not a right to free speech. If we had a right to free speech, there would be no consequence to lying, or perjury, or slander, etc.</p><p></p><p>We have the right to peaceably assemble. We can have laws that assure we assemble peaceably.</p><p></p><p>We have the right to be secure in our person, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches, but law can be passed that would outline that which is reasonable, and a warrant must be issued supported by probable cause, etc.</p><p></p><p>But, when it comes to the Second Amendment's protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, there is nothing in that amendment allowing any leeway whatsoever. It is absolute. It is unique in that standing.</p><p></p><p>All in government who pass law in violation of the Second Amendment are guilty of misprision. All in government who fail to remove such law are just as guilty of misprision as those who passed the unconstitutional law. All who enforce such law are guilty of misprision as well.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3109701, member: 745"] Yes, some rights are regulate-able and can be done so by the very virtue of how they are crafted. Take freedom of speech for example. We have freedom of speech but not a right to free speech. If we had a right to free speech, there would be no consequence to lying, or perjury, or slander, etc. We have the right to peaceably assemble. We can have laws that assure we assemble peaceably. We have the right to be secure in our person, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches, but law can be passed that would outline that which is reasonable, and a warrant must be issued supported by probable cause, etc. But, when it comes to the Second Amendment's protection of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, there is nothing in that amendment allowing any leeway whatsoever. It is absolute. It is unique in that standing. All in government who pass law in violation of the Second Amendment are guilty of misprision. All in government who fail to remove such law are just as guilty of misprision as those who passed the unconstitutional law. All who enforce such law are guilty of misprision as well. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constitutional Carry (SB 1212) on the OK House floor 4/23
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom