Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Constitutional Carry send your support
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3204498" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>I had this discussion at the range with an instructor and he was adamant about not allowing carry without the course. When I pointed out that it goes against the 2A, he looked at me and said "Don't give me that BS". I just nodded and walked away. I understand the wanting training for those who carry. Most people now days are not instructed on how to handle a firearm or shoot by their parents as older generations were. And there are people I wouldn't trust with a nerf gun much less an actual firearm. But the fact remains we all are born with the right to self defense. No law should seek to restrict that right unless taken by due process. Yes, this will mean there could be instances where someone screws up because they lacked the proper training, but you can not restrict the masses just because a possibility exists, especially when other states have shown this not to be a problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3204498, member: 43724"] I had this discussion at the range with an instructor and he was adamant about not allowing carry without the course. When I pointed out that it goes against the 2A, he looked at me and said "Don't give me that BS". I just nodded and walked away. I understand the wanting training for those who carry. Most people now days are not instructed on how to handle a firearm or shoot by their parents as older generations were. And there are people I wouldn't trust with a nerf gun much less an actual firearm. But the fact remains we all are born with the right to self defense. No law should seek to restrict that right unless taken by due process. Yes, this will mean there could be instances where someone screws up because they lacked the proper training, but you can not restrict the masses just because a possibility exists, especially when other states have shown this not to be a problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Constitutional Carry send your support
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom