Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Contact Your State Legislators
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DavidMcmillan" data-source="post: 3326867" data-attributes="member: 11749"><p>One of our basic problems, is the idea of "infringe". To the average, none-firearm citizen, magazine size, and most of the other issues, just doesn't seem as an infringement or inconvenience to having a firearm. When we say, "what part of infringement do you not understand?", it's falling on deaf ears. We need to be doing a better job of explaining that idea. I had that conversation with one of our state reps last year. After we discussed it for a while, he said he understood better, but I'm not sure he really did. But, we did have a good conversation where he did confess that he did have a good number of questions that were not being answered by the likes of Mr. Dunnington, etc. </p><p></p><p>Of the ones that I've talked with over the years, I've never had one refuse to listen and ask questions. </p><p></p><p>Most of them are either uninformed, or trying to represent what they see as the majority of their constituents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DavidMcmillan, post: 3326867, member: 11749"] One of our basic problems, is the idea of "infringe". To the average, none-firearm citizen, magazine size, and most of the other issues, just doesn't seem as an infringement or inconvenience to having a firearm. When we say, "what part of infringement do you not understand?", it's falling on deaf ears. We need to be doing a better job of explaining that idea. I had that conversation with one of our state reps last year. After we discussed it for a while, he said he understood better, but I'm not sure he really did. But, we did have a good conversation where he did confess that he did have a good number of questions that were not being answered by the likes of Mr. Dunnington, etc. Of the ones that I've talked with over the years, I've never had one refuse to listen and ask questions. Most of them are either uninformed, or trying to represent what they see as the majority of their constituents. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Contact Your State Legislators
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom