Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Copied from another web site:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2057017" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>It should be noted that Judge Kozinski was writing a dissenting opinion, not the opinion of the court. Also, the year is wrong. The case is <em>Silveira v. Lockyer</em>, 312 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). <em>Silveira</em> disagreed with the earlier <em>United States v. Emerson</em>, 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001), which held that the 2nd Amendment was an individual right. Ultimately the issue was settled in <em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), which we all know.</p><p></p><p>The <em>Heller</em> decision was actually a bit watered down from the DC Circuit Court of Appeal's opinion in <em>Parker v. Dist. of Columbia</em>, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (the lower court case that was appealed to SCOTUS). In <em>Parker</em>, the court held:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2057017, member: 13624"] It should be noted that Judge Kozinski was writing a dissenting opinion, not the opinion of the court. Also, the year is wrong. The case is [I]Silveira v. Lockyer[/I], 312 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). [I]Silveira[/I] disagreed with the earlier [I]United States v. Emerson[/I], 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001), which held that the 2nd Amendment was an individual right. Ultimately the issue was settled in [I]District of Columbia v. Heller[/I], 554 U.S. 570 (2008), which we all know. The [I]Heller[/I] decision was actually a bit watered down from the DC Circuit Court of Appeal's opinion in [I]Parker v. Dist. of Columbia[/I], 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (the lower court case that was appealed to SCOTUS). In [I]Parker[/I], the court held: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Copied from another web site:
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom