Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Coyote season?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="r00s7a" data-source="post: 1412641" data-attributes="member: 9675"><p>Possibly... if I am interpreting the regs correctly and there are no other regs that cover the topic. I am just applying Boolean logic gates to their statement of "it shall be unlawful to hunt, take or attempt to take coyotes from dark to daylight with the aid of any artificial light and any sight dog." </p><p></p><p>I doubt it would hold up in court to say, "I was hunting after dark with the aid of artifical light but without a sight dog, therefore I was legal" OR "I was hunting after dark without the aid of artificial light but with a sight dog, therefore I was legal", but that's how the regs read. Forgive me, I am a computer guy... there is a big difference between AND and OR.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I don't think there should be any room for interpretation of the regs, by a game warden or individual. They should be clear and concise and not allow for any misconstruance by anyone. Just because they may have put an AND in there where there should be an OR would never be enough for me to break out the spotlight!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="r00s7a, post: 1412641, member: 9675"] Possibly... if I am interpreting the regs correctly and there are no other regs that cover the topic. I am just applying Boolean logic gates to their statement of "it shall be unlawful to hunt, take or attempt to take coyotes from dark to daylight with the aid of any artificial light and any sight dog." I doubt it would hold up in court to say, "I was hunting after dark with the aid of artifical light but without a sight dog, therefore I was legal" OR "I was hunting after dark without the aid of artificial light but with a sight dog, therefore I was legal", but that's how the regs read. Forgive me, I am a computer guy... there is a big difference between AND and OR. Personally, I don't think there should be any room for interpretation of the regs, by a game warden or individual. They should be clear and concise and not allow for any misconstruance by anyone. Just because they may have put an AND in there where there should be an OR would never be enough for me to break out the spotlight! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Coyote season?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom