Credible News Source??

[emapples]

Where do you go to get news? News that you believe to be trustworthy and credible?

From what I could find the most neutral world news source is and yes it's difficult for me to say....but from what I found the Christian Science Monitor is considered the most neutral and balance source of reporting.

Exclude any article about Christian Science and they are the best I could find

 

[John6185]

I don't watch CNN or MSNBC for obvious reasons. Fox used to have my attention but since Roger Alles departed and several commentators have also since left and the network seems to be slipping from neutral to liberal, my watching Fox has tapered off.

 

[SdoubleA]

I gave up on the msm a long time ago. These sites are usually what I view, and have for years.

townhall.com

wnd.com

timesofisrael.com

breitbart.com

debka.com

americanthinker.com


I am pretty certain my listing these will probably piss off those on my ignore list.

 

[RugersGR8]

Megyn Kelly's interview with Alex Jones may have sank her career---she has burned her bridges on the right and left.

http://pagesix.com/2017/06/13/nbc-holding-crisis-meetings-over-megyn-kelly/
NBC holding crisis meetings over Megyn Kelly
By Carlos Greer June 13, 2017 | 10:02pm

 

[RugersGR8]

http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/megyn-kellys-second-episode-draws-3-6-million-viewers/332151
Megyn Kelly’s Second Episode Draws 3.6 Million Viewers
By Chris Ariens on Jun. 13, 2017 - 12:26 PM
..."the second episode of Kelly’s show, which included an interview with Erin Andrews, averaged 3.6 million, down -42 percent from its debut episode a week earlier."...

 

[OKCHunter]

I think each news outlet caters to their typical viewer.

 

[YukonGlocker]

We can't accurately assess information based solely on the site it's published on. Not only is that illogical (i.e., the genetic fallacy), but those kind of inferences were a lost cause the second people figured out the persuasive power of pouring money/resources into the spreading of written words.

 

[Dave70968]

We can't accurately assess information based solely on the site it's published on. Not only is that illogical (i.e., the genetic fallacy), but those kind of inferences were a lost cause the second people figured out the persuasive power of pouring money/resources into the spreading of written words.

To wit: I'm generally wary of the Washington Post, but I'll read anything Radley Balko writes, regardless of where it finds print. He's earned that trust.