Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dahm vs. Morgan round 1
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2395774" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>I just watched the video clip. Morgan tried to equate the kid's right to life with the RKBA, implying the kid's right to life supplants anyone's RKBA. Fact is, the state took away the kid's right to defend his life and didn't replace it with state supplied defense of any of those kids' lives. EVERYONE has the right to life. EVERYONE has the right to protect that life. If the state limits or prohibits anyone's right to defend their life, the state in essence has taken the responsibility for whatever happens to that person. If the state takes a kid away from the guardianship of that kids parents such as in school, shouldn't the state provide the very same security as the parents can provide? </p><p></p><p>Every life has equal standing. Stripping the tools from a person to defend self, family, home, state, and country is as diabolical as the state not providing protection for someone(a kid) that the state as removed from the protection of family guardianship. </p><p></p><p>As for the violent criminals and mentally ill, if they are so dangerous as to be prohibited arms, they are too dangerous to be set free in society. If it is known those people are violent or mentally disturbed, it is because they have been adjudicated as such, and if not executed, MUST be kept sequestered in prison, an institution, or under full time guardianship. As for those who haven't been discovered, it is because they haven't been caught committing a violent act yet which <em><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">THAT ALONE</span></em> is reason enough for everyone else to be armed, and for our kids to be protected by the state that gathers them up into those godforsaken gun-free killing zones called "schools".</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2395774, member: 745"] I just watched the video clip. Morgan tried to equate the kid's right to life with the RKBA, implying the kid's right to life supplants anyone's RKBA. Fact is, the state took away the kid's right to defend his life and didn't replace it with state supplied defense of any of those kids' lives. EVERYONE has the right to life. EVERYONE has the right to protect that life. If the state limits or prohibits anyone's right to defend their life, the state in essence has taken the responsibility for whatever happens to that person. If the state takes a kid away from the guardianship of that kids parents such as in school, shouldn't the state provide the very same security as the parents can provide? Every life has equal standing. Stripping the tools from a person to defend self, family, home, state, and country is as diabolical as the state not providing protection for someone(a kid) that the state as removed from the protection of family guardianship. As for the violent criminals and mentally ill, if they are so dangerous as to be prohibited arms, they are too dangerous to be set free in society. If it is known those people are violent or mentally disturbed, it is because they have been adjudicated as such, and if not executed, MUST be kept sequestered in prison, an institution, or under full time guardianship. As for those who haven't been discovered, it is because they haven't been caught committing a violent act yet which [I][FONT=Times New Roman]THAT ALONE[/FONT][/I] is reason enough for everyone else to be armed, and for our kids to be protected by the state that gathers them up into those godforsaken gun-free killing zones called "schools". Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Dahm vs. Morgan round 1
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom