Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daniel Shaver shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="C_Hallbert" data-source="post: 3061385" data-attributes="member: 42957"><p>CLEET Training back in the 80s emphasized that one of the scenarios where it was appropriate to respond with Deadly Force was: if a subject had the Ability and Demonstrated the Intent to Kill or Inflict Major Bodily Harm to Oneself or Any Other Person. It was emphasized that a weapon had to be visible and that the subject had to move the weapon in a direction that posed an immediate threat. Is this changed? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="C_Hallbert, post: 3061385, member: 42957"] CLEET Training back in the 80s emphasized that one of the scenarios where it was appropriate to respond with Deadly Force was: if a subject had the Ability and Demonstrated the Intent to Kill or Inflict Major Bodily Harm to Oneself or Any Other Person. It was emphasized that a weapon had to be visible and that the subject had to move the weapon in a direction that posed an immediate threat. Is this changed? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daniel Shaver shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom