Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daniel Shaver shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 3061467" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>Plus the constant interlacing of commands with the threat of "If'n youze makes a miztake, Ima gonna keel you!"</p><p></p><p>I can't imagine ANY situation where constant threat of death will EVER de-escalate. </p><p></p><p>The guy was <u><em><strong>OBVIOUSLY</strong></em></u> trying to comply. There was also, despite denial, some impairment. Note that the guy was having difficulty identifying his left leg when instructed to cross left leg over right leg.</p><p></p><p>IMO, this was a better case for 1st degree than some of the civilian shootings, such as Jerome Ersland.</p><p></p><p>Officers - who had a desire to shoot someone; note "You're ****ed" engraving - deliberately, continually, and unnecessarily issued complex commands to an obviously impaired yet compliant subject until the subject was no longer able, or failed, to comply; and immediately shot him dead.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 3061467, member: 423"] Plus the constant interlacing of commands with the threat of "If'n youze makes a miztake, Ima gonna keel you!" I can't imagine ANY situation where constant threat of death will EVER de-escalate. The guy was [U][I][B]OBVIOUSLY[/B][/I][/U] trying to comply. There was also, despite denial, some impairment. Note that the guy was having difficulty identifying his left leg when instructed to cross left leg over right leg. IMO, this was a better case for 1st degree than some of the civilian shootings, such as Jerome Ersland. Officers - who had a desire to shoot someone; note "You're ****ed" engraving - deliberately, continually, and unnecessarily issued complex commands to an obviously impaired yet compliant subject until the subject was no longer able, or failed, to comply; and immediately shot him dead. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daniel Shaver shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom