Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BadgeBunny" data-source="post: 1566496" data-attributes="member: 1242"><p>Evidence (including Ersland's own statements) which were presented at trial ... I'm going by all of the evidence I have seen. ALL of it, not just the parts that suit my interpretation of what probably happened -- which is well documented in the thread I linked below.</p><p></p><p>Plenty of evidence was presented that Parker was not moving AND that he was still alive. </p><p></p><p>I never said that it was possible to kill a dead guy.</p><p></p><p>I'm not even sure what to say about your comments regarding the jury and what they heard. Both sides had the same set of facts to work with. Both sides put on what they considered to be the most truthful accounting of those facts. The jury obviously believed that Prater met his burden. I tend to believe the jury got it right. Others don't feel that way.</p><p> </p><p>This has all been discussed at length here:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?111034-Latest-in-the-Jerome-Jay-Ersland-saga." target="_blank">http://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?111034-Latest-in-the-Jerome-Jay-Ersland-saga.</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BadgeBunny, post: 1566496, member: 1242"] Evidence (including Ersland's own statements) which were presented at trial ... I'm going by all of the evidence I have seen. ALL of it, not just the parts that suit my interpretation of what probably happened -- which is well documented in the thread I linked below. Plenty of evidence was presented that Parker was not moving AND that he was still alive. I never said that it was possible to kill a dead guy. I'm not even sure what to say about your comments regarding the jury and what they heard. Both sides had the same set of facts to work with. Both sides put on what they considered to be the most truthful accounting of those facts. The jury obviously believed that Prater met his burden. I tend to believe the jury got it right. Others don't feel that way. This has all been discussed at length here: [URL="http://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?111034-Latest-in-the-Jerome-Jay-Ersland-saga."]http://www.okshooters.com/showthread.php?111034-Latest-in-the-Jerome-Jay-Ersland-saga.[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Defense Attorney Critical...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom