Delusional reality: Everything peddled by politicians, media, banks and television

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

11b1776

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Gibson
Prior to 1945, fluoride was properly regarded as an environmental pollutant. It was responsible for many lawsuits against industries, such as the aluminum industry and the phosphate fertilizer industry, whose waste products contain large quantities of fluoride. This fluoride destroyed crops and animals, leading to the lawsuits. The limited public view was that fluoride was an environmental pollutant that needed to be reduced or eliminated from the environment.


The Wall Street Journal recently (3-23-06) ran an article reporting on the National Academy of Science's concern about high levels of fluoride in the nation's drinking water, and that the maximum allowed amount "should be lowered."
 

11b1776

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Gibson
The fluoride used for water fluoridation does not have FDA approval and is considered by the FDA as an “unapproved drug”. The proper use of any drug requires an understanding of how much is too much. Since fluoride is already in many foods and beverages, an estimated total intake of existing fluoride amounts is imperative. Research shows fluoridation is unnecessary since we’re already receiving 300% or more of the American Dental Association’s recommended daily amount.#
The chemicals used for fluoridation are not high purity, pharmaceutical quality products. Rather they are byproducts of aluminum and fertilizer manufacturing and contain a high concentration of toxins and heavy metals such as arsenic, lead and chromium. All proven to be carcinogens.#
Newsweek Magazine advised the public that “political decisions [about fluoridation] were at odds with expert advice” and “fluoride from your tap may not do much good-and may cause cancer.” Then, in 1992, Newsweek published another fluoride safety related article, “Is Science Censored?, a look at how political considerations influence what scientific studies get published.”#
 

11b1776

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Gibson
Children’s sodium fluoride anti-cavity supplements were never found safe or effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). They were never even tested.
So why are these prescription drugs allowed despite no FDA approval? Because fluoride supplements were “grandfathered in” before the 1938 law was enacted requiring drug testing.
So, products on the market before 1938 were presumed safe by the FDA who allowed grandfathered drugs to be sold without any testing. Once a drug is on the market for any reason, doctors can use them to treat any disease or condition.
Sodium fluoride was on the market pre-1938, but not to stop cavities and not for any medical reason. Sodium fluoride sold as a rat poison.
So, in effect, the FDA says – since sodium fluoride safely and effectively killed rats before 1938, the FDA considers it is safe to give to little children to prevent tooth decay.From a 1951 American Dental Association brochure:
“There is no proof that commercial preparations such as tablets, dentifrices, mouthwashes or chewing gum containing fluorides are effective in preventing dental decay. Unfortunately such preparations are being offered to the public without adequate scientific evidence of their value.”*
 

reddog1

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
11,598
Reaction score
175
Location
FEMA Reigion 6 Broken Arrow
ok.. flouride is good for you. My bad.

Im glad SOME of you actually do research, oh where would we be without you.

Thanks SO much for opening my eyes and seeing that the government is right, flouride IS good for me, and my Family.

well you go ahead and keep drinking it Einstien.

I will pass. It's an industrial waste byproduct. nuff said.
 

11b1776

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 12, 2011
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Gibson
In January of 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed lowering the amount of fluoride in public water supplies. The HHS proposal would advise community water utilities to limit fluoride in tap water to 0.7 milligrams per liter, a 42 percent drop from the current standard. A final decision on new fluoride standards is expected in early 2012.
The American Dental Association supports the new limits proposed on fluoridated water but continues to stand behind adding fluoride to toothpaste.
Beyond the contentious debate over whether fluoride leads to serious health concerns is the fact that many people doubt whether fluoride even helps improve the cavity rate of adults. “There are no studies that show that,” Dr. Brownstein says.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom