As pissed as I am about that, it was probably for the better. Because Al Gore....
As pissed as I am about that, it was probably for the better. Because Al Gore....
Ted Kennedy..... and many more.
For the record, it's happened across the aisle, but much more on one side. You figure it out which.
For the record, it's happened across the aisle, but much more on one side. You figure it out which.
Even MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle is wondering if Laura Ingraham is right---that is, did Democrats called for the resignation of Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) over sexual misconduct accusations as a political calculation that could eventually lead to the impeachment of President Donald Trump.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...tm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=
MSNBC’s Ruhle: Could Franken Ouster Lead to Trump’s Impeachment?
by PAM KEY - 7 Dec 2017
Wouldn't the possibility of Trump being impeached not have to have an event that occurred during his Presidential term instead of before?
I get so sick of these liberal talking heads in the MSM. The hatred for Trump is disgusting. Look if you don’t like his politics fine, if you don’t like him fine, but he was duly elected by we the people. They always use the “he’s not popular and he is a reprehensible person yet he is the president” crap. Yeah I’m sure he is unpopular with them and their ilk. But for most Americans he is popular. He is doing almost everything he said he would do. But that’s just not good enough for the liberals. Like I said many times before. No matter what good Trump or the republicans for that matter do, the liberals and the democrats will never give them credit for doing good. The hatred is too deep. But I am sure glad to see Franken go. He didn’t deserve that position. Like 99% of the fools in our government.
Despite my distaste for brandishing, your description reaffirms to me that Moore actually understands what the 2nd Amendment is for, and Jones does not.
My point is that if Alabamans want to elect a Republican, that's exactly what they should do, then sort out whether they want Moore to represent them until 2021. The timing of these accusations automatically makes them suspect. They shouldn't be forced to abandon their political convictions for over three years, just because the left mounted a well timed political attack in the 11th hour.
He absolutely, positively committed a 1001(g) crime. The fact that they didn't prosecute him criminally on that speaks to the double standard that's at the heart of my refusal to refer to our legal system as a "justice" system.
Beverly Young Nelson, the liar who accused Moore of sexually assaulting her has just admitted to forging Moore's signature in her yearbook!
What source are you using? I’m reading that the inscription and signature are still (claimed) genuine, and the dates and “notes,” were added.
www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/08/roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-part-yearbook-inscription-attributed-to-alabama-senate-candidate.amp.html
edited for clarity
Last edited:
I was replying to dennishoddy's assertion that impeachment constitutes evidence. It doesn't. There's an old cliché that a good prosecutor could get a jury to indict a ham sandwich; an indictment--or impeachment--is no evidence at all.
As to his crimes, hoddy's standard for Moore is conviction; by that same standard, Slick Willy is A-okay.
It's a poor standard.
Link?
If true, it utterly destroys her credibility. IF...
I don't disagree, but the system has a habit of going soft on some, and hard as hell on others. Just pointing out that fact.
