Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
DNC President Debate, 10/15/19
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3280793" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>Andrew Yang and others continue to talk about the industrial revolution costing the people in Ohio 10 million jobs in the next 5 years because the Unions aren't strong enough and there will be jobs lost. </p><p>For Historical accuracy the industrial revolution started in 1760. The reason the steel industry left the rust belt is because the unions would not allow innovation to save one job. It all moved overseas. </p><p>So the dims are advocating going back to the old days? </p><p>I guess they don't understand that when technology progresses it creates new jobs. Those that build the machinery and those that operate it. Yes, it requires less manpower but it produces other jobs in the maintenance field that require a higher level of learning, programmers, Schedulers, paper pushers, and so on. </p><p>When CNC machine tools came on the scene, you would have thought the world was going to come to an end from the unions and those that ran worn out conventional machines. </p><p>Look at our guns now. Right out of the box most are easily capable of MOA accuracy at 100 yards because of improved technology. Everything is consistent and within specs. A $400 AR with good ammo can shoot just as good as a $1000 Weatherby from 30 years ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3280793, member: 5412"] Andrew Yang and others continue to talk about the industrial revolution costing the people in Ohio 10 million jobs in the next 5 years because the Unions aren't strong enough and there will be jobs lost. For Historical accuracy the industrial revolution started in 1760. The reason the steel industry left the rust belt is because the unions would not allow innovation to save one job. It all moved overseas. So the dims are advocating going back to the old days? I guess they don't understand that when technology progresses it creates new jobs. Those that build the machinery and those that operate it. Yes, it requires less manpower but it produces other jobs in the maintenance field that require a higher level of learning, programmers, Schedulers, paper pushers, and so on. When CNC machine tools came on the scene, you would have thought the world was going to come to an end from the unions and those that ran worn out conventional machines. Look at our guns now. Right out of the box most are easily capable of MOA accuracy at 100 yards because of improved technology. Everything is consistent and within specs. A $400 AR with good ammo can shoot just as good as a $1000 Weatherby from 30 years ago. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
DNC President Debate, 10/15/19
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom