Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 3256837" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>You initially brought up the other scenarios. I simply pointed out that the Constitution clearly gives States the right, authority, leeway or which ever word doesn't trigger someone, to establish their own election procedures and policies, through both it's silence on the issue and direct verbiage. That especially applies to the extra-constitutional practice of political party primary voting. That's not "whataboutism", that's a discussion of the constitutionality.</p><p></p><p>Now, for some "whataboutism". Why would one be ok with financial disclosures for one political office balloting but not the office of President? Multiple states have established those, and they have withstood court challenge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 3256837, member: 42"] You initially brought up the other scenarios. I simply pointed out that the Constitution clearly gives States the right, authority, leeway or which ever word doesn't trigger someone, to establish their own election procedures and policies, through both it's silence on the issue and direct verbiage. That especially applies to the extra-constitutional practice of political party primary voting. That's not "whataboutism", that's a discussion of the constitutionality. Now, for some "whataboutism". Why would one be ok with financial disclosures for one political office balloting but not the office of President? Multiple states have established those, and they have withstood court challenge. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom