Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3257050" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Obviously there is not one. But then again there aren’t constitutional rules about needing signatures to get on the ballot either, yet those rules exist at the state level. Clearly the constitution says what minimums are required so that a person CAN be president.</p><p></p><p>And as I said, the law seems to apply equally for people seeking to be on the presidential ballot in California. As was noted above, there is no test to see how much money you have to qualify, merely the act of releasing the document. </p><p></p><p>Nothing in the California law would (seem to) negate trump (or any candidate) from being president. He or she would just have a harder time if the candidates opts out of releasing the document, which would be a choice on that person’s part. </p><p></p><p>The courts may see it as a burden. I never said otherwise. But you still haven’t shown how it discrinates against trump simply because he doesn’t want to release the filings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3257050, member: 277"] Obviously there is not one. But then again there aren’t constitutional rules about needing signatures to get on the ballot either, yet those rules exist at the state level. Clearly the constitution says what minimums are required so that a person CAN be president. And as I said, the law seems to apply equally for people seeking to be on the presidential ballot in California. As was noted above, there is no test to see how much money you have to qualify, merely the act of releasing the document. Nothing in the California law would (seem to) negate trump (or any candidate) from being president. He or she would just have a harder time if the candidates opts out of releasing the document, which would be a choice on that person’s part. The courts may see it as a burden. I never said otherwise. But you still haven’t shown how it discrinates against trump simply because he doesn’t want to release the filings. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom