Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 3257146" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>I'm not saying it's unconstitutional because I disagree with it, I'm saying I question it because it is discriminatory, especially in it's intent as they are trying to control who will be on the ballot, and it's definitely not a requirement laid forth by the Constitution. Finally, how far do we go here? Imagine the uproar if we required genetic testing results to be disclosed to be on a ballot? Apologize for it all you want, but it's a stupid game they a playing.</p><p></p><p>With regard to the insistence on the whataboutism. It certainly is, because this particular issue has not been legally tested. Now if you insist it's the same on your criteria.... then... I certainly hope you have the conviction here to defend any "Assault Rifle" ban employed by the democrats going forward. I mean, other states have those laws, they've been allowed to stand, and The Constitution doesn't name them specifically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 3257146, member: 24"] I'm not saying it's unconstitutional because I disagree with it, I'm saying I question it because it is discriminatory, especially in it's intent as they are trying to control who will be on the ballot, and it's definitely not a requirement laid forth by the Constitution. Finally, how far do we go here? Imagine the uproar if we required genetic testing results to be disclosed to be on a ballot? Apologize for it all you want, but it's a stupid game they a playing. With regard to the insistence on the whataboutism. It certainly is, because this particular issue has not been legally tested. Now if you insist it's the same on your criteria.... then... I certainly hope you have the conviction here to defend any "Assault Rifle" ban employed by the democrats going forward. I mean, other states have those laws, they've been allowed to stand, and The Constitution doesn't name them specifically. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Do you think this helps conservatives?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom