Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Surveyor1653" data-source="post: 2772815" data-attributes="member: 5197"><p>He stated that the training should be voluntary and that any training related to the legal portion, when offered by the state, should be free. Nowhere in his post does he make the case for compulsory training of any kind.</p><p></p><p>The funny thing is that, as an NRA Instructor, I have access to others across the country. Many of those are in states with Constitutional Carry, some of whom have made that change fairly recently. You know what happened? People who were previously REQUIRED to take an NRA course (or some other) to obtain a license now take that training WILLINGLY. That's right: Many of those Instructors have seen little to no drop in enrollment in their courses, despite them no longer being required. Are people going to carry untrained? Hell yes. They do already. If polled and answering <u>honestly</u>, I would wager that more than 85% of the members of this forum have attended fewer than 3 formal classes of any kind since obtaining a HGL and the SDA course not included. Of those, probably that percentage again would claim "0" formal courses. Again, if answering honestly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Surveyor1653, post: 2772815, member: 5197"] He stated that the training should be voluntary and that any training related to the legal portion, when offered by the state, should be free. Nowhere in his post does he make the case for compulsory training of any kind. The funny thing is that, as an NRA Instructor, I have access to others across the country. Many of those are in states with Constitutional Carry, some of whom have made that change fairly recently. You know what happened? People who were previously REQUIRED to take an NRA course (or some other) to obtain a license now take that training WILLINGLY. That's right: Many of those Instructors have seen little to no drop in enrollment in their courses, despite them no longer being required. Are people going to carry untrained? Hell yes. They do already. If polled and answering [U]honestly[/U], I would wager that more than 85% of the members of this forum have attended fewer than 3 formal classes of any kind since obtaining a HGL and the SDA course not included. Of those, probably that percentage again would claim "0" formal courses. Again, if answering honestly. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom