Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SM Rider" data-source="post: 2775564" data-attributes="member: 35816"><p>The fact remains that most people are still wanting to petition a paper fiction to exercise a natural human right. This implies then that the right is not a right but a privilege. A privilege reluctantly granted by those who control you.</p><p></p><p>Prior to the constitution or any other piece of paper a man simple acquired the arm of his choice and began to carry that tool. He did not ask any other man's permission to do this. He did not petition the masters that he himself put onto a throne by virtue of his ability to vote for his master.</p><p></p><p>The constitution has allowed those in power to infringe on your natural rights. Or it has been powerless in preventing the infringement of your natural rights. In either case, it is worthless except as an idol for many to worship. And since no man can serve two masters, the obvious conclusion is that most have regulated the Author of Freedom to second fiddle. You've decided that other men, speaking on your behalf that you chose, will be your master instead of the Creator. And in doing so you've sold your birthright of freedom for an illusion. You are not free like you think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SM Rider, post: 2775564, member: 35816"] The fact remains that most people are still wanting to petition a paper fiction to exercise a natural human right. This implies then that the right is not a right but a privilege. A privilege reluctantly granted by those who control you. Prior to the constitution or any other piece of paper a man simple acquired the arm of his choice and began to carry that tool. He did not ask any other man's permission to do this. He did not petition the masters that he himself put onto a throne by virtue of his ability to vote for his master. The constitution has allowed those in power to infringe on your natural rights. Or it has been powerless in preventing the infringement of your natural rights. In either case, it is worthless except as an idol for many to worship. And since no man can serve two masters, the obvious conclusion is that most have regulated the Author of Freedom to second fiddle. You've decided that other men, speaking on your behalf that you chose, will be your master instead of the Creator. And in doing so you've sold your birthright of freedom for an illusion. You are not free like you think. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Do You Want Constitutional Carry in Oklahoma?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom