Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Doc & Sda
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crosstimbers Okie" data-source="post: 901412" data-attributes="member: 760"><p>57 OS 21, which predates SDA. It says that one may not bring a firearm on to DOC property where prisoners are located <u>without authority</u>. Then in 1995, the same body that wrote Title 57 changed Title 21 and granted authority to do it via the SDA. Then DOC created policies to securely store said handguns but now it wants to prosecute an employee even as those policies are in effect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crosstimbers Okie, post: 901412, member: 760"] 57 OS 21, which predates SDA. It says that one may not bring a firearm on to DOC property where prisoners are located [U]without authority[/U]. Then in 1995, the same body that wrote Title 57 changed Title 21 and granted authority to do it via the SDA. Then DOC created policies to securely store said handguns but now it wants to prosecute an employee even as those policies are in effect. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Doc & Sda
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom