Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Domestic Violence Restraining Order Prohibiting Gun Possession: UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OK Corgi Rancher" data-source="post: 3961401" data-attributes="member: 45773"><p>Ironically, it was some dude that probably shouldn't have guns that brought the case. The challenge was heard in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in northern Texas.</p><p></p><p>It involved a guy named Rahimi who had a restraining order from a prior domestic incident. He was involved in 5 different shootings and was ultimately arrested. The police found he had the RO and he admitted that he owned two guns...which would be a violation of the RO and federal law. So this guy challenges the validity of the RO removing his 2A rights...</p><p></p><p>And the court AGREED! A lot of their decision, once again, refers back to Bruen. That is turning out to be a massively important case for pro 2A people.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]WOwSyEEBprk[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OK Corgi Rancher, post: 3961401, member: 45773"] Ironically, it was some dude that probably shouldn't have guns that brought the case. The challenge was heard in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in northern Texas. It involved a guy named Rahimi who had a restraining order from a prior domestic incident. He was involved in 5 different shootings and was ultimately arrested. The police found he had the RO and he admitted that he owned two guns...which would be a violation of the RO and federal law. So this guy challenges the validity of the RO removing his 2A rights... And the court AGREED! A lot of their decision, once again, refers back to Bruen. That is turning out to be a massively important case for pro 2A people. [MEDIA=youtube]WOwSyEEBprk[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Domestic Violence Restraining Order Prohibiting Gun Possession: UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom