Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Drug testing for Welfare payments
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tschwarz" data-source="post: 1620950" data-attributes="member: 19893"><p>My belief / opinion is that we will never solve these problems by adding additional layers of complexity to the many that already exist. The fabric of society is tearing at an increasing rate. We have families that have lived on the dole for multiple generations now. You can't fix that sort of entitlement mentality simply by adding an additional hurdle or requirement. People like this literally have nothing better to do than sit around and figure out ways to scam the system and devise methods to circumvent any safeguard you can dream up. I've known people using EBT cards while students in college that could easily have worked a job but chose not to; or, they did have a job and used the money they earned for partying. I know someone who has admitted to me personally that he faked symptoms in order to be diagnosed bipolar and is now receiving disability benefits. I've heard of others that use migraine headaches as a means of qualifying for disability. Some people have truly devolved into disgusting parasites.</p><p></p><p>I realize that there are a great many people currently on these programs that are not trying to scam them, rather they have actually paid into these programs by working most of their lives and are victims of the current economy. I'm personally not opposed to your idea of subsidized training in principle; however, why don't they just use the existing federal student loan programs? Perhaps more relevant at the present time is the question of what you would even train these people to do? Do we continue the stupidity of the past few years and train them into the artificial, government created 'green' sector? Every other day some .gov planner hack comes up with the latest idea for how .gov can end human misery if they only had a few more dollars and another program / agency. 'The more the planners plan, the more the plans fail.' It's blatant idiocy at this point.</p><p></p><p>We are always trying to solve the symptoms of the problem (rampant food stamps, the need for section 8 housing, generational welfare, the approaching insolvency of social security, the increasing costs of health care, etc.) instead of dealing with the actual problem(s) itself. The biggest problem, by far, is the constant .gov intervention in all matters under the sun, and the result is an environment in which creating jobs here is unattractive compared to other options. When President Taft first proposed the idea that later became the 16th Amendment, he outlined his vision of a plan that would create a 2% excise tax on all corporations and a 1-7% income tax that would ONLY apply to the top few % of the wealthiest earners, which, btw, is the only reason 2/3 of the states were ignorant enough to ratify it. It was ratified in 1913 and by 1917 the rate on the highest bracket went from 7% to 67% and then up to 77% a year later - talk about getting royally screwed in the ass. The stats for corporate tax rates are not quite as crazy, but the general pattern was the same. We currently have the second highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world (Japan = 39.5, US = 39.2). This, however, is not anywhere near the biggest issue. The damn U.S. Code of Federal Regulations was over 80,000 pages in 2010! It was estimated that in 2009 federal regulation cost businesses and consumers $1.75 trillion, or nearly 12% of America’s 2009 GDP. As a comparison, in the same year, corporate pre-tax profits for all businesses totaled about $ 1.46 trillion. I won't even go into the topic of modern day unions. People (mostly liberals and fools) usually dismiss these things with the argument that taxes were higher and unions more prevalent in the 1950's and 60's and we enjoyed more economic prosperity than ever witnessed throughout history. The correlation between that economic prosperity, high tax rates and ever increasing regulation during that period is complete ********. The prosperity was a result of the simple and unavoidable fact that the rest of the industrialized world and their respective manufacturing capabilities had been effectively bombed back into the middle ages during WWII, thus leaving us in the incredibly fortunate position of having to pick up much of that slack. As nations rebuilt and retooled their economies, our economic situation correspondingly declined. The exceptions to that decline have occurred from time to time as we were in a position to pioneer certain revolutionary movements - silicon chips, computers, and the internet are a few good examples. The simple fact is that, though those exceptions have prolonged the inevitable, the present circumstances we find ourselves in were not exactly unpredictable. The problems have gotten increasingly worse as technology has eliminated a great number of traditional jobs that used to exist. It has also resulted in giant leaps in worker productivity, thus fewer people are needed to accomplish the same work.</p><p></p><p>Sorry for the long rant but the context is vital in understanding the actual problems we face and being able to identify steps towards real solutions. You will not fix welfare, high debt, social security / medicare insolvency, stagnant wages or any of the many other problems until you reform the tax policies and regulations that have made this country a real pain in the ass in which to do business. When good jobs are available, a great many of the other problems we are dealing with in society will generally take care of themselves, or at least will not present themselves as such a major thorn in everyone's side.</p><p></p><p>[/rant]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tschwarz, post: 1620950, member: 19893"] My belief / opinion is that we will never solve these problems by adding additional layers of complexity to the many that already exist. The fabric of society is tearing at an increasing rate. We have families that have lived on the dole for multiple generations now. You can't fix that sort of entitlement mentality simply by adding an additional hurdle or requirement. People like this literally have nothing better to do than sit around and figure out ways to scam the system and devise methods to circumvent any safeguard you can dream up. I've known people using EBT cards while students in college that could easily have worked a job but chose not to; or, they did have a job and used the money they earned for partying. I know someone who has admitted to me personally that he faked symptoms in order to be diagnosed bipolar and is now receiving disability benefits. I've heard of others that use migraine headaches as a means of qualifying for disability. Some people have truly devolved into disgusting parasites. I realize that there are a great many people currently on these programs that are not trying to scam them, rather they have actually paid into these programs by working most of their lives and are victims of the current economy. I'm personally not opposed to your idea of subsidized training in principle; however, why don't they just use the existing federal student loan programs? Perhaps more relevant at the present time is the question of what you would even train these people to do? Do we continue the stupidity of the past few years and train them into the artificial, government created 'green' sector? Every other day some .gov planner hack comes up with the latest idea for how .gov can end human misery if they only had a few more dollars and another program / agency. 'The more the planners plan, the more the plans fail.' It's blatant idiocy at this point. We are always trying to solve the symptoms of the problem (rampant food stamps, the need for section 8 housing, generational welfare, the approaching insolvency of social security, the increasing costs of health care, etc.) instead of dealing with the actual problem(s) itself. The biggest problem, by far, is the constant .gov intervention in all matters under the sun, and the result is an environment in which creating jobs here is unattractive compared to other options. When President Taft first proposed the idea that later became the 16th Amendment, he outlined his vision of a plan that would create a 2% excise tax on all corporations and a 1-7% income tax that would ONLY apply to the top few % of the wealthiest earners, which, btw, is the only reason 2/3 of the states were ignorant enough to ratify it. It was ratified in 1913 and by 1917 the rate on the highest bracket went from 7% to 67% and then up to 77% a year later - talk about getting royally screwed in the ass. The stats for corporate tax rates are not quite as crazy, but the general pattern was the same. We currently have the second highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world (Japan = 39.5, US = 39.2). This, however, is not anywhere near the biggest issue. The damn U.S. Code of Federal Regulations was over 80,000 pages in 2010! It was estimated that in 2009 federal regulation cost businesses and consumers $1.75 trillion, or nearly 12% of America’s 2009 GDP. As a comparison, in the same year, corporate pre-tax profits for all businesses totaled about $ 1.46 trillion. I won't even go into the topic of modern day unions. People (mostly liberals and fools) usually dismiss these things with the argument that taxes were higher and unions more prevalent in the 1950's and 60's and we enjoyed more economic prosperity than ever witnessed throughout history. The correlation between that economic prosperity, high tax rates and ever increasing regulation during that period is complete ********. The prosperity was a result of the simple and unavoidable fact that the rest of the industrialized world and their respective manufacturing capabilities had been effectively bombed back into the middle ages during WWII, thus leaving us in the incredibly fortunate position of having to pick up much of that slack. As nations rebuilt and retooled their economies, our economic situation correspondingly declined. The exceptions to that decline have occurred from time to time as we were in a position to pioneer certain revolutionary movements - silicon chips, computers, and the internet are a few good examples. The simple fact is that, though those exceptions have prolonged the inevitable, the present circumstances we find ourselves in were not exactly unpredictable. The problems have gotten increasingly worse as technology has eliminated a great number of traditional jobs that used to exist. It has also resulted in giant leaps in worker productivity, thus fewer people are needed to accomplish the same work. Sorry for the long rant but the context is vital in understanding the actual problems we face and being able to identify steps towards real solutions. You will not fix welfare, high debt, social security / medicare insolvency, stagnant wages or any of the many other problems until you reform the tax policies and regulations that have made this country a real pain in the ass in which to do business. When good jobs are available, a great many of the other problems we are dealing with in society will generally take care of themselves, or at least will not present themselves as such a major thorn in everyone's side. [/rant] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Drug testing for Welfare payments
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom