Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
dSLR cameras/photography
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="71buickfreak" data-source="post: 2796880" data-attributes="member: 8373"><p>I grew up using Nikons, but I found a really good deal on my first DSLR, which was a Canon and never looked back. I prefer the Canon interface too. You will never notice the difference between 24.2 and 18mp, not even in print. I used to shoot magazine stories with a 3mp cam, it is the quality of the image, not the size. You just can't blow it up as big. An 18MP pic at full res can be blown up to billboard size, I doubt you will be trying to print one of those!</p><p></p><p>I have tried the wifi thing, it is really just a big hassle to me. I have an Eyefi card, never use it. Don't get me wrong, it has it's uses, but it shouldn't be a deal breaker. Both of my boys (14 and 10) use Canon DSLRs, they are easy to shoot. They have full auto, but it is a waste of the cam to use it in full auto. My boys are not allowed to use full auto, I suggest you set in manual and never change it. Make yourself use the cam as it should be and your pics will be much better. </p><p></p><p>Photography is expensive, but the beauty of digital is the film is free!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="71buickfreak, post: 2796880, member: 8373"] I grew up using Nikons, but I found a really good deal on my first DSLR, which was a Canon and never looked back. I prefer the Canon interface too. You will never notice the difference between 24.2 and 18mp, not even in print. I used to shoot magazine stories with a 3mp cam, it is the quality of the image, not the size. You just can't blow it up as big. An 18MP pic at full res can be blown up to billboard size, I doubt you will be trying to print one of those! I have tried the wifi thing, it is really just a big hassle to me. I have an Eyefi card, never use it. Don't get me wrong, it has it's uses, but it shouldn't be a deal breaker. Both of my boys (14 and 10) use Canon DSLRs, they are easy to shoot. They have full auto, but it is a waste of the cam to use it in full auto. My boys are not allowed to use full auto, I suggest you set in manual and never change it. Make yourself use the cam as it should be and your pics will be much better. Photography is expensive, but the beauty of digital is the film is free! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
dSLR cameras/photography
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom