Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Election 2012
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1815898" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>Would not George Shultz's positions on the drug war and racial quotas in the private sector be "evil liberal ideology"?</p><p></p><p>What about Edwin Meese and Dick Thornburgh refusing to investigate the Justice Department's involvement in software piracy?</p><p></p><p>Or Anne Gorsuch's refusal to turn over to Congress records of where certain money had been "spent"?</p><p></p><p>Or Reagan's direct funding of terrorism that severely dwarfs Obama's?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Conservatives" want someone like Reagan. They say so constantly on the radio and TV. Conservatives are calling on Mitt to be "more like Reagan" in hopes that a certain bloc of swing voters that have bought into the conservative mass media's revision of the Reagan era.</p><p></p><p>Which is truly worse when history is considered over rhetoric?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1815898, member: 5151"] Would not George Shultz's positions on the drug war and racial quotas in the private sector be "evil liberal ideology"? What about Edwin Meese and Dick Thornburgh refusing to investigate the Justice Department's involvement in software piracy? Or Anne Gorsuch's refusal to turn over to Congress records of where certain money had been "spent"? Or Reagan's direct funding of terrorism that severely dwarfs Obama's? "Conservatives" want someone like Reagan. They say so constantly on the radio and TV. Conservatives are calling on Mitt to be "more like Reagan" in hopes that a certain bloc of swing voters that have bought into the conservative mass media's revision of the Reagan era. Which is truly worse when history is considered over rhetoric? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Election 2012
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom