Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="okgr8outdrs" data-source="post: 219775" data-attributes="member: 263"><p>I understand that. The vehicle would have to be occupied for someone to be forcibly removed. The intent implies to me that an occupant being forcibly removed is automatically given the justification of imminent danger whether a weapon is present or not. I would also think it is intended to prevent a victim outside the car from shooting someone inside the car who had no right to be there, much the same as standing outside a house and shooting a BG inside. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps a good argument cannot be made from that. In my uber-simple logic, my vehicle is my property, no matter where it is. If I can be fired because a search found company property in my vehicle while parked in the company parking lot, it must not be company property.</p><p></p><p>Anti-gun company policies are as effective at stopping gun violence in the workplace as "gun free" school zones are at stopping gun violence in schools.</p><p></p><p>I also believe that no one just "snaps" and goes postal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="okgr8outdrs, post: 219775, member: 263"] I understand that. The vehicle would have to be occupied for someone to be forcibly removed. The intent implies to me that an occupant being forcibly removed is automatically given the justification of imminent danger whether a weapon is present or not. I would also think it is intended to prevent a victim outside the car from shooting someone inside the car who had no right to be there, much the same as standing outside a house and shooting a BG inside. Perhaps a good argument cannot be made from that. In my uber-simple logic, my vehicle is my property, no matter where it is. If I can be fired because a search found company property in my vehicle while parked in the company parking lot, it must not be company property. Anti-gun company policies are as effective at stopping gun violence in the workplace as "gun free" school zones are at stopping gun violence in schools. I also believe that no one just "snaps" and goes postal. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom