Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mons meg" data-source="post: 268857" data-attributes="member: 90"><p>I think we can come up with plenty of examples of how property owners do *not* enjoy complete control of their property...but let's not go there just yet.</p><p></p><p>Think of it this way. Two competing interests are colliding here. The State of Oklahoma decided to come down on the side of the individual, subject to certain limitations (gun must be left in the locked vehicle). A Federal judge has no place to usurp the Oklahoma Legislature in this case, especially since this has nothing to do with "workplace safety" or even interstate commerce.</p><p></p><p>I'd say if you have a strong opinion on this, you should take it up with your local representative to the State House, as I believe the law passed by a wide margin:</p><p></p><p>from <a href="http://www.nraila.org/issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=193" target="_blank">http://www.nraila.org/issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=193</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, now we can "go there". I agree with NRAILA in that this is essentially a civil rights issue. Business owners are not free to disregard the civil rights of others simply because you stepped over their threshold. Or are we arguing that the 2nd Amendment doesn't describe a civil right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mons meg, post: 268857, member: 90"] I think we can come up with plenty of examples of how property owners do *not* enjoy complete control of their property...but let's not go there just yet. Think of it this way. Two competing interests are colliding here. The State of Oklahoma decided to come down on the side of the individual, subject to certain limitations (gun must be left in the locked vehicle). A Federal judge has no place to usurp the Oklahoma Legislature in this case, especially since this has nothing to do with "workplace safety" or even interstate commerce. I'd say if you have a strong opinion on this, you should take it up with your local representative to the State House, as I believe the law passed by a wide margin: from [url]http://www.nraila.org/issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=193[/url] Ok, now we can "go there". I agree with NRAILA in that this is essentially a civil rights issue. Business owners are not free to disregard the civil rights of others simply because you stepped over their threshold. Or are we arguing that the 2nd Amendment doesn't describe a civil right? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Employers can forbid guns, a judge rules, issues an injunction against OK law.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom