Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
EPA Considering Ban on Traditional Ammunition
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1262796" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Important information that you didn't post:</p><p></p><p>The original petition and supporting briefs: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0681" target="_blank">http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0681</a></p><p></p><p>The link for where to comment on the petition: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480b3974b" target="_blank">http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480b3974b</a></p><p></p><p>The NSSF statement that is not entirely correct. It would apply to component shot and bullets (still VERY bad for those of us who reload). From page 58 of the petition: </p><p></p><p>The petitioners are asking that the EPA ban lead bulleted ammunition: but the EPA's hands are tied on loaded ammo due to this: As the NSSF is correct in asserting, loaded ammunition is exempt from EPA regulatory oversight because it is subject to an excise tax under 26 U.S.C. 4181 of the IRS code.</p><p></p><p>When commenting on proposed rulemaking, please keep your comments professional and fact based. Irrational tirades harm, not help the defeat of bad rules. For you fishermen, this attempt to ban lead also covers fishing sinkers. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1262796, member: 1132"] Important information that you didn't post: The original petition and supporting briefs: [url]http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0681[/url] The link for where to comment on the petition: [url]http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480b3974b[/url] The NSSF statement that is not entirely correct. It would apply to component shot and bullets (still VERY bad for those of us who reload). From page 58 of the petition: The petitioners are asking that the EPA ban lead bulleted ammunition: but the EPA's hands are tied on loaded ammo due to this: As the NSSF is correct in asserting, loaded ammunition is exempt from EPA regulatory oversight because it is subject to an excise tax under 26 U.S.C. 4181 of the IRS code. When commenting on proposed rulemaking, please keep your comments professional and fact based. Irrational tirades harm, not help the defeat of bad rules. For you fishermen, this attempt to ban lead also covers fishing sinkers. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
EPA Considering Ban on Traditional Ammunition
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom