Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Even a cheap whore gets a turn..
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TANSTAAFL" data-source="post: 4161966" data-attributes="member: 27098"><p>Actually I can see how one may like the grip angle and even the ergonomics of a california compliant AR 15 depending on the model. It would yield a more traditional line of site and shouldering. I have no problem with that at all. What I do have a problem with is a gov't or state entity dictating what I may or may not buy when it comes to a firearm. Remember the 1994 AWB? Many small 10 rd Compact and sub compact semi autos came out of that simply because gun manufacturers found they could shrink the size of the firearm. For those who like the Sig P365, Springfield Hellcat, Glock 43 and others these are a direct descendant to the changes that occurred between 1994 and 2004. Yes, it was wrong to dictate Magazine capacity, but some good occurred as a result. The anti-gunners will not make the same mistake again, so vote accordingly and make your voices heard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TANSTAAFL, post: 4161966, member: 27098"] Actually I can see how one may like the grip angle and even the ergonomics of a california compliant AR 15 depending on the model. It would yield a more traditional line of site and shouldering. I have no problem with that at all. What I do have a problem with is a gov't or state entity dictating what I may or may not buy when it comes to a firearm. Remember the 1994 AWB? Many small 10 rd Compact and sub compact semi autos came out of that simply because gun manufacturers found they could shrink the size of the firearm. For those who like the Sig P365, Springfield Hellcat, Glock 43 and others these are a direct descendant to the changes that occurred between 1994 and 2004. Yes, it was wrong to dictate Magazine capacity, but some good occurred as a result. The anti-gunners will not make the same mistake again, so vote accordingly and make your voices heard. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Even a cheap whore gets a turn..
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom