Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rod Snell" data-source="post: 2826272" data-attributes="member: 796"><p>Well, if you're questioning my qualifications, or the source of my post, then here they are:</p><p></p><p>I have advanced degrees in Atmospheric Science from Univ of Wa and Univ of Ill. My special area of interest is sensors, especially remote sensing. I was the DoD deputy director on the joint NEXRAD program during the development phase. I was on the joint (DoD, NOAA, FAA) committee that developed the standards now used for the unmanned weather stations at small airports.</p><p>I have had my work published on the problems of correcting data sets and reconciling two disparate weather data sets in real time on the Chicago Area Program(CHAP).</p><p></p><p>During over 10 years working on joint committees and programs with NWS, I made many friends and connections, and know from personal communication that the orders to modify the REAL DATA comes from the political appointee NOAA deputy. As I am now retired, I am not subject to getting approval for what I say and write in public, as long as I stay out of classified material. The meterologists still working for the government ARE muzzled.</p><p></p><p>The practice of "bogusing" data in real time is necessary to remove obviously bad data to prevent the forecast model from using the bad data and making erroneous "bullseyes" in the data output.</p><p>The new practice of "bogusing" climate data to raise the recorded temperature at correctly sited sensors with the data from urban sensors is bad science, and applying that same correction to NASA satellite 15 channel infrared data is equally questionable.</p><p></p><p>The satellite data has proven most reliable over the ocean in areas where NOAA bouys accurately measure the sea surface temperature. And for the last couple of decades, there has been no significant change in the average global temp as measured by the satellites before being subjected to data bogusing. Make of that what you will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rod Snell, post: 2826272, member: 796"] Well, if you're questioning my qualifications, or the source of my post, then here they are: I have advanced degrees in Atmospheric Science from Univ of Wa and Univ of Ill. My special area of interest is sensors, especially remote sensing. I was the DoD deputy director on the joint NEXRAD program during the development phase. I was on the joint (DoD, NOAA, FAA) committee that developed the standards now used for the unmanned weather stations at small airports. I have had my work published on the problems of correcting data sets and reconciling two disparate weather data sets in real time on the Chicago Area Program(CHAP). During over 10 years working on joint committees and programs with NWS, I made many friends and connections, and know from personal communication that the orders to modify the REAL DATA comes from the political appointee NOAA deputy. As I am now retired, I am not subject to getting approval for what I say and write in public, as long as I stay out of classified material. The meterologists still working for the government ARE muzzled. The practice of "bogusing" data in real time is necessary to remove obviously bad data to prevent the forecast model from using the bad data and making erroneous "bullseyes" in the data output. The new practice of "bogusing" climate data to raise the recorded temperature at correctly sited sensors with the data from urban sensors is bad science, and applying that same correction to NASA satellite 15 channel infrared data is equally questionable. The satellite data has proven most reliable over the ocean in areas where NOAA bouys accurately measure the sea surface temperature. And for the last couple of decades, there has been no significant change in the average global temp as measured by the satellites before being subjected to data bogusing. Make of that what you will. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
EXCLUSIVE: NOAA Relies On Compromised Thermometers That Inflate US Warming Trend
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom