Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal appeals courts strikes down Illinois CCW ban
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coded-Dude" data-source="post: 2015191" data-attributes="member: 16918"><p>Mostly agreed because there is already a split decision because of the Kalchalsky case, so this will likely go to SCOTUS regardless(althouhg I hope the CA9 panel sees these cases for what they are - 2A violations). That, and the 9th could ignore this ruling completely saying CA doesn't have an outright ban on issuing licenses(and that their level of strict scrutiny is fine). However, I think the cases(Richards & Peruta) were argued well and used Heller to establish that; 1) it is a right beyond the home - and 2) too much scrutiny can cause constitutional controversy. Most of that is opinion, but SAF continues to win 2A case after 2A case and there is a good chance we could prevail here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coded-Dude, post: 2015191, member: 16918"] Mostly agreed because there is already a split decision because of the Kalchalsky case, so this will likely go to SCOTUS regardless(althouhg I hope the CA9 panel sees these cases for what they are - 2A violations). That, and the 9th could ignore this ruling completely saying CA doesn't have an outright ban on issuing licenses(and that their level of strict scrutiny is fine). However, I think the cases(Richards & Peruta) were argued well and used Heller to establish that; 1) it is a right beyond the home - and 2) too much scrutiny can cause constitutional controversy. Most of that is opinion, but SAF continues to win 2A case after 2A case and there is a good chance we could prevail here. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal appeals courts strikes down Illinois CCW ban
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom