Federal Court Finds California Magazine Ban Violates the Second Amendment

[RickN]

"Judge Benitez rendered his opinion late Friday afternoon and handed Second Amendment supporters a sweeping victory by completely invalidating California’s 10-round limit on magazine capacity. “Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts,” he declared. "

https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...qb1EJaNB2iAtdPwl5ONg8ppVaaG9nuHYCddZcTHoi0TCk

 

[dennishoddy]

Good deal. It's time that insanity was halted, although I see it getting all the way to the supreme court and even then commiefornika probably won't agree to go along with it.

 

[DillerKiller]

I'm still leaving this $#!+hole asap...

 

[rlongnt]

I'm still leaving this $#!+hole asap...

I would quit my job that requires me to live in a metro area "near data centers" and move to Lone Pine in a heartbeat if the rest of the state hadn't lost its mind. Sad that a place so beautiful is so "not free".

I'm happy to see this ruling though.

 

[RugersGR8]

https://patriotpost.us/articles/62104-district-judge-ca-magazine-ban-violates-second-amendment
District Judge: CA Magazine Ban Violates Second Amendment
California cannot ban standard-capacity magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
Nate Jackson · Apr. 1, 2019

 

[Louro]

Great news for California..........

 

[Glock 40]

So can you own preban mags above 10 rounds? Just wondering if they pass another unconstitutional law. Will they require the destruction of all mags that are bought between now and then.

 

[n423]

 

[druryj]

Take that you gun-grabbing fruitcakes!

 

[dennishoddy]

So can you own preban mags above 10 rounds? Just wondering if they pass another unconstitutional law. Will they require the destruction of all mags that are bought between now and then.

If I remember right you had to surrender or destroy any magazines above 10 rounds.