Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal judge says those accused of felonies still have Second Amendment rights
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TedKennedy" data-source="post: 3862548" data-attributes="member: 25419"><p><strong>"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury</strong>, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; <strong>nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb*</strong>; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,<strong><em> nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;</em></strong> nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."</p><p></p><p>And different topic - but asset forfeiture is a big deal to me. When we allow armed thugs to confiscate property without due process we allow our basic rights to be trampled on. </p><p></p><p>And I can already hear the righteous crying "those dope dealers need to lose everything!"</p><p>Problem is - when you allow anyone's rights to be violated, it paves the way for your rights to be violated as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TedKennedy, post: 3862548, member: 25419"] [B]"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury[/B], except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; [B]nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb*[/B]; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,[B][I] nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;[/I][/B] nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." And different topic - but asset forfeiture is a big deal to me. When we allow armed thugs to confiscate property without due process we allow our basic rights to be trampled on. And I can already hear the righteous crying "those dope dealers need to lose everything!" Problem is - when you allow anyone's rights to be violated, it paves the way for your rights to be violated as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Federal judge says those accused of felonies still have Second Amendment rights
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom