Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Feds sue EoTech
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2817850" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>Well I wouldn't call it a piece of trash unless you are using it in very cold temps. I've owned a couple and have friends that put the number into the dozens that have never had an issue. But to the DoD there most definitely are some issues with them.</p><p></p><p>I can say from experience that most of the gravity of this suit comes from the fact that they covered it up rather than the actual problems with the system. That's evidenced by the fact that the DoD kept taking delivery and issuing them. If the problems were of a really serious magnitude, it would have shown up in the field long before it became known, they took delivery for what 10 years? But with all that said, Paul Magano should be in prison. I've actually seen people convicted and sent to prison for falsifying inspection reports on .gov contracts. That guy went to GREAT pains to keep the problems quiet. He fired a co-founder that wanted to disclose for a long time before they did and I'm kinda shocked that it was actually kept quiet for as long as it was. Stupid is as stupid does....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2817850, member: 3099"] Well I wouldn't call it a piece of trash unless you are using it in very cold temps. I've owned a couple and have friends that put the number into the dozens that have never had an issue. But to the DoD there most definitely are some issues with them. I can say from experience that most of the gravity of this suit comes from the fact that they covered it up rather than the actual problems with the system. That's evidenced by the fact that the DoD kept taking delivery and issuing them. If the problems were of a really serious magnitude, it would have shown up in the field long before it became known, they took delivery for what 10 years? But with all that said, Paul Magano should be in prison. I've actually seen people convicted and sent to prison for falsifying inspection reports on .gov contracts. That guy went to GREAT pains to keep the problems quiet. He fired a co-founder that wanted to disclose for a long time before they did and I'm kinda shocked that it was actually kept quiet for as long as it was. Stupid is as stupid does.... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Feds sue EoTech
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom