Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Firearm related stickers on vehicles
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="g54b16psi" data-source="post: 3860987" data-attributes="member: 49052"><p>During the time I was in the Army in the intelligence field, I learned about (and embraced) the concept of OPSEC (operational security). The entire intelligence field is based on 'Need to Know'...if you don't need to know it, you won't have access to it. As much as I am totally for freedom of speech, willingly providing potential enemies with useful intel is only increasing your chances of a negative situation. Like in Desert Shield, with CNN interviewing military consultants: Idiot journalist: "What could Saddam do to really hinder the coalition forces?" Idiot consultant: "Well, he could set all those oil wells on fire, that would really suck." You think Saddam WASN'T watching CNN? Guess what happened. He sets all the oil wells on fire. And it really sucked for the good guys (them, too, but who cares).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="g54b16psi, post: 3860987, member: 49052"] During the time I was in the Army in the intelligence field, I learned about (and embraced) the concept of OPSEC (operational security). The entire intelligence field is based on 'Need to Know'...if you don't need to know it, you won't have access to it. As much as I am totally for freedom of speech, willingly providing potential enemies with useful intel is only increasing your chances of a negative situation. Like in Desert Shield, with CNN interviewing military consultants: Idiot journalist: "What could Saddam do to really hinder the coalition forces?" Idiot consultant: "Well, he could set all those oil wells on fire, that would really suck." You think Saddam WASN'T watching CNN? Guess what happened. He sets all the oil wells on fire. And it really sucked for the good guys (them, too, but who cares). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Firearms Chat
Firearm related stickers on vehicles
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom