George Floyd Toxicology Report

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Slim Deal

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
1,582
Reaction score
2,650
Location
NE OK
Yep it also kills big friggen 6'2" black rats that are on methamphetamines and who knows what else. Floyd the criminal is taking a dirt nap that he probably should have taken a long time before his recent encounter with the law. The people of Minneapolis owe him and his family NOTHING.
 

SSGDave762

Marksman
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Messages
16
Reaction score
23
Location
Tolleson Az
With that fentanyl level, he prob would have died shortly after the police got there, even if they never touched him. Don’t think he can get a fair trial. Cops life is ruined with either a conviction or acquittal.
Especially with all the psychos screaming for his life and Floyd's family cashing in on his death along with all the Other crazies just using the excuse to destroy, burn, etc.
 

SSGDave762

Marksman
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Messages
16
Reaction score
23
Location
Tolleson Az
Maybe. City may throw cop under the bus, fire him, distance themselves as much as possible in order to avoid bearing responsibility.

In any case, I'm for eliminating immunity for cops. I don't have immunity from prosecution in my FAA regulated job, my wife doesn't have it in her extremely risky anesthesia job. We are held to account for our actions. Our employers are accountable too - cops aren't any different.
Leos Are Held accountable and get prosecuted, nyc just chose to sacrifice their police to socialism. Jumping on that bandwagon tells us who Part of that problem Is.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,556
Reaction score
61,838
Location
Ponca City Ok
Beats the taxpayers getting screwed every time a city pays for some cop's misbehavior.
I do think the misbehavior is very minor but it certainly happens and in that case the person wronged needs and deserves the ability to recover damages.
Body cams have shown both bad behavior by LEO and shown the bad nature of the majority of contacts they make.
The cams have also shown trumped up charges made by contacts that were false that may have made it through the courts without them.
Example, hands up, don't shoot!
Totally falsified reports by "eyewitnesses" to create the narrative the cop was bad.
When the actual trial concluded, the officer was found to be fighting for his life, threatened and attacked by a criminal thug and found innocent. He was doing his job and did it by the book, yet he lost his job and will never get the profession he always wanted back. The taxpayers lost how many millions in riots that had no basis? Any justification for that?
Riots ensued, and the national opinion was swayed by these false reports putting a black eye on LEO when it was unwarranted.
Those false facts in this case and others I can bring up are still being used to complete the narrative that cops are bad and all the rest of the malarkey that goes along with this BS so moral outrage and riots can happen.
Riots, looting and burning seem to be a national past time with liberals now.
GOT A TICKET FOR RUNNING A RED LIGHT!!! BURN THIS BIATCH DOWN!
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,556
Reaction score
61,838
Location
Ponca City Ok
Maybe. City may throw cop under the bus, fire him, distance themselves as much as possible in order to avoid bearing responsibility.

In any case, I'm for eliminating immunity for cops. I don't have immunity from prosecution in my FAA regulated job, my wife doesn't have it in her extremely risky anesthesia job. We are held to account for our actions. Our employers are accountable too - cops aren't any different.
Your wife has insurance if anything occurs that she might be sued by a client.
I'm not sure where your personally liable in your duties as long as your within the regulations of the agency you work for are being followed. Can an ATC be sued personally if an aircraft crashes with bad intel from the ATC or does the agency get sued?
I just spent 30 minutes looking for an answer to the question just asked, and had zero results.
 

dennishoddy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
84,556
Reaction score
61,838
Location
Ponca City Ok
Cities seem to afford paying for police misdeeds ok.

So do farmers, .
The state of Ok provides qualified immunity for land owners if an injury occurs during the act of a sporting event or some such wording if you allow someone on your land for hunting, fishing, etc as long as the landowner doesn't have punji stakes or something set to intentionally injure.
Reducing Liability
Some landowners forgo income from a hunting lease because they do not wish to increase their liability risks. Oklahoma’s recreational use statute and Oklahoma Limitation of Liability for Farming and Ranching Act may offer protection from liability for landowners when guests use their property without fees, when lessees pay less than $10 per acre, or when the lessees and guests sign a properly executed liability waiver.
 
Last edited:

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,214
Reaction score
12,367
Location
Tulsa
Your wife has insurance if anything occurs that she might be sued by a client.
I'm not sure where your personally liable in your duties as long as your within the regulations of the agency you work for are being followed. Can an ATC be sued personally if an aircraft crashes with bad intel from the ATC or does the agency get sued?
I just spent 30 minutes looking for an answer to the question just asked, and had zero results.

My wife pays for that insurance.

If I break the law (FAA regs) myself and the company I work for can be fined, and I am subject to criminal prosecution depending on the severity of the case.
 

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,214
Reaction score
12,367
Location
Tulsa
The state of Ok provides qualified immunity for land owners if an injury occurs during the act of a sporting event or some such wording if you allow someone on your land for hunting, fishing, etc as long as the landowner doesn't have punji stakes or something set to intentionally injure.
Reducing Liability
Some landowners forgo income from a hunting lease because they do not wish to increase their liability risks. Oklahoma’s recreational use statute and Oklahoma Limitation of Liability for Farming and Ranching Act may offer protection from liability for landowners when guests use their property without fees, when lessees pay less than $10 per acre, or when the lessees and guests sign a properly executed liability waiver.

Landowners are allowing someone to use their land, they are not injecting themselves into people's homes, vehicles, etc..

Interactions between landowners and users should be voluntary on both parties. (if not, the constitutes kidnapping, which is only allowed by state employees)
 

OKC03Cobra

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
999
Location
Norman
166795575_147347803973242_8127562125665421335_n.jpg
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom