Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Glock hater thinking of buying a Glock
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druryj" data-source="post: 3207292" data-attributes="member: 10465"><p>I want one. Guess I just need to get one. I have some fine leather for the 43 already, and apparently it will work fine for the 43X. But for the same reasons as some nice, I’m wanting a 48. So what’s a another $100-$150 or so gonna matter if I have to buy new holsters and such? Negligible, really. The thing I DON’T get is why Glock didn’t make these 10 round mags compatible with the 43? I mean, it makes sense, and follows the existing pattern of the G17 mags working in the 19 and 26, a thing that was pretty cool to lots of people. Now; they go and make a whole new mag for the 43X and 48...why? I just don’t get it. It may be a question worthy of its own thread...yeah, I think it is...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druryj, post: 3207292, member: 10465"] I want one. Guess I just need to get one. I have some fine leather for the 43 already, and apparently it will work fine for the 43X. But for the same reasons as some nice, I’m wanting a 48. So what’s a another $100-$150 or so gonna matter if I have to buy new holsters and such? Negligible, really. The thing I DON’T get is why Glock didn’t make these 10 round mags compatible with the 43? I mean, it makes sense, and follows the existing pattern of the G17 mags working in the 19 and 26, a thing that was pretty cool to lots of people. Now; they go and make a whole new mag for the 43X and 48...why? I just don’t get it. It may be a question worthy of its own thread...yeah, I think it is... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Glock hater thinking of buying a Glock
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom