Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gov. Stitt on Fox Business now...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3578639" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>It's sad... I agree our vets should have better care. Yes, some folks have had great experiences, I know Dennis has been pretty happy with his V.A. care. I just know from OUR side, they make the hoops to jump through so difficult and you can't get a straight answer and you get a different answer every time you call... it's immensely frustrating. Not to mention the times I've been stiffed due to their runaround paperwork mess.</p><p></p><p>Like this...</p><p></p><p>We got a notification about April 10th that 6 of my V.A. patients' annual authorizations were being canceled. Apparently the V.A. office was changing their address, so the authorization we had for July 1-June 30 would no longer be valid. The problem was, when we got this notification (again, like Apr 10), it was dated for March 31st. During that interim 10d I think I had already seen 3 of those patients for regular checkups or something or other. Which means, those claims will be denied as having 'no authorization for care'. No appeal, no nothing. I've had this happen before. </p><p></p><p>Sorry for the vets, but eff the V.A.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3578639, member: 9374"] It's sad... I agree our vets should have better care. Yes, some folks have had great experiences, I know Dennis has been pretty happy with his V.A. care. I just know from OUR side, they make the hoops to jump through so difficult and you can't get a straight answer and you get a different answer every time you call... it's immensely frustrating. Not to mention the times I've been stiffed due to their runaround paperwork mess. Like this... We got a notification about April 10th that 6 of my V.A. patients' annual authorizations were being canceled. Apparently the V.A. office was changing their address, so the authorization we had for July 1-June 30 would no longer be valid. The problem was, when we got this notification (again, like Apr 10), it was dated for March 31st. During that interim 10d I think I had already seen 3 of those patients for regular checkups or something or other. Which means, those claims will be denied as having 'no authorization for care'. No appeal, no nothing. I've had this happen before. Sorry for the vets, but eff the V.A. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gov. Stitt on Fox Business now...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom