Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="golddigger14s" data-source="post: 3331511" data-attributes="member: 43617"><p>From WAGUNS.ORG:</p><p>"</p><p>What an awesome idea........ Minnesota: New Bill Would Allow Legally Armed Citizens To Sue Gun Free Zone Businesses If Injured While Disarmed</p><p></p><p>I can wrap my head around this..............</p><p></p><p>a portion of the article: Concealed Nation reports:</p><p></p><p>This new bill would change those requirements by adding something new. All notifications now must state that anyone prohibited from carrying a firearm is “under the custodial responsibility” of the business that is banning guns on their premises.</p><p></p><p>Details of the new bill state that a business or property owners which prohibits the carrying of firearms “shall assume absolute custodial responsibility for the safety and defense of the unarmed person” while the person is on the property.</p><p></p><p>Link: <a href="https://thewashingtonstandard.com/minnesota-new-bill-would-allow-legally-armed-citizens-to-sue-gun-free-zone-businesses-if-injured-while-disarmed/" target="_blank">https://thewashingtonstandard.com/minne ... -disarmed/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now.......... How quickly would Gun Free Zones disappear?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="golddigger14s, post: 3331511, member: 43617"] From WAGUNS.ORG: " What an awesome idea........ Minnesota: New Bill Would Allow Legally Armed Citizens To Sue Gun Free Zone Businesses If Injured While Disarmed I can wrap my head around this.............. a portion of the article: Concealed Nation reports: This new bill would change those requirements by adding something new. All notifications now must state that anyone prohibited from carrying a firearm is “under the custodial responsibility” of the business that is banning guns on their premises. Details of the new bill state that a business or property owners which prohibits the carrying of firearms “shall assume absolute custodial responsibility for the safety and defense of the unarmed person” while the person is on the property. Link: [URL='https://thewashingtonstandard.com/minnesota-new-bill-would-allow-legally-armed-citizens-to-sue-gun-free-zone-businesses-if-injured-while-disarmed/']https://thewashingtonstandard.com/minne ... -disarmed/[/URL] Now.......... How quickly would Gun Free Zones disappear?" [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom