Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="corneileous" data-source="post: 3332917" data-attributes="member: 45041"><p>I know this is all just <em>your two cents</em> but nobody is saying that just because a business is open to the public that it’s automatically all the sudden public property so therefore that part’s a moot point. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And yes, you are allowed to walk in that business at the owners pleasure but because that same business owner’s house is not open to the public, pretty much what you just said about your private home, is not totally the same thing and has no business being compared to side by side, nor can it be looked at from the same perspective. Yes, both places are private property but not everyone is just going to be allowed to walk into that business owners house just like they are in his his store.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but what does this have to do with the discussion of deciding whether or not it’s fair to make these business owners liable from keeping patrons from being able to carry their guns in the store?</p><p></p><p>Yeah, I know, you’re trying to lump it all into the same pile of the amount of stuff the store owner can dictate in his property, but nobody in this discussion cares about store hours, allowed and not allowed clothing, yadda, yadda, yadda, it’s about gun free zones and how they create unsafe places for people.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. This is all stuff that most of us know. </p><p></p><p></p><p>For the sake of private property rights – I agree but, that right that private property owners have who open up a place of business that’s welcome to the public and hangs a sign also gets people killed, just sayin.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I know that’s just your two cents and maybe this is just my opinion but in my opinion, you still need to separate and not just focus on the part where your private property property rights allow you to do whatever you want..... including casting a blind eye to the fact that you’re right to hang that no guns sign invites more violence. </p><p></p><p>Just my two cents I guess. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="corneileous, post: 3332917, member: 45041"] I know this is all just [i]your two cents[/I] but nobody is saying that just because a business is open to the public that it’s automatically all the sudden public property so therefore that part’s a moot point. And yes, you are allowed to walk in that business at the owners pleasure but because that same business owner’s house is not open to the public, pretty much what you just said about your private home, is not totally the same thing and has no business being compared to side by side, nor can it be looked at from the same perspective. Yes, both places are private property but not everyone is just going to be allowed to walk into that business owners house just like they are in his his store. Yes, but what does this have to do with the discussion of deciding whether or not it’s fair to make these business owners liable from keeping patrons from being able to carry their guns in the store? Yeah, I know, you’re trying to lump it all into the same pile of the amount of stuff the store owner can dictate in his property, but nobody in this discussion cares about store hours, allowed and not allowed clothing, yadda, yadda, yadda, it’s about gun free zones and how they create unsafe places for people. Yes. This is all stuff that most of us know. For the sake of private property rights – I agree but, that right that private property owners have who open up a place of business that’s welcome to the public and hangs a sign also gets people killed, just sayin. Again, I know that’s just your two cents and maybe this is just my opinion but in my opinion, you still need to separate and not just focus on the part where your private property property rights allow you to do whatever you want..... including casting a blind eye to the fact that you’re right to hang that no guns sign invites more violence. Just my two cents I guess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom