Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druryj" data-source="post: 3333156" data-attributes="member: 10465"><p>Why would someone think that a <em>private business</em> has <u>any </u>responsibility for your safety even if they do have a "No Guns" sign? I do not approve of Government at any level <em>forcing </em>a private business owner to be responsible for your safety, even if they post a sign or have a policy of not allowing firearms in their private place of business. </p><p></p><p>The Government itself doesn't provide for your safety in prohibited places like the Post office, a Federal Building, a courtroom, etc. where you are prohibited from carrying a weapon <u>by law</u>. So if the .gov isn't going to guarantee your protection in places they control, how can they even begin to think they can force a private owner to do so?</p><p></p><p>What's next? Making people who do not want guns in their house responsible for your safety in their home? Are you forced to enter it? </p><p></p><p>You DO NOT have to go into that private business if you don't want to.</p><p>You make the choice to enter even if you're not allowed to carry.</p><p>Nobody is twisting your arm.</p><p></p><p>Make the choice, but for damn sure, let's not ask the Government to force private business owners to do something they don't and won't do.</p><p></p><p>* And <u>stop with the insults </u>and thinly veiled comments. It's getting out of hand and it needs to stop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druryj, post: 3333156, member: 10465"] Why would someone think that a [I]private business[/I] has [U]any [/U]responsibility for your safety even if they do have a "No Guns" sign? I do not approve of Government at any level [I]forcing [/I]a private business owner to be responsible for your safety, even if they post a sign or have a policy of not allowing firearms in their private place of business. The Government itself doesn't provide for your safety in prohibited places like the Post office, a Federal Building, a courtroom, etc. where you are prohibited from carrying a weapon [U]by law[/U]. So if the .gov isn't going to guarantee your protection in places they control, how can they even begin to think they can force a private owner to do so? What's next? Making people who do not want guns in their house responsible for your safety in their home? Are you forced to enter it? You DO NOT have to go into that private business if you don't want to. You make the choice to enter even if you're not allowed to carry. Nobody is twisting your arm. Make the choice, but for damn sure, let's not ask the Government to force private business owners to do something they don't and won't do. * And [U]stop with the insults [/U]and thinly veiled comments. It's getting out of hand and it needs to stop. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom