Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3333762" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>I can understand the part about TactiCool Timmy's going around and compensating for their .22 derringer in their pants. And I have never said I want the business to NOT have the right to choose, rather I want them liable if that choice causes me to be injured due to an assault while on their property. All in all I won't say your argument is wrong, it isn't. I just feel there is an argument to be made that by putting up those signs the business creates an environment that is less safe. Ultimately, that would have to be decided by a court of law. In the mean time, again, I'm just left with one of the three options I've previously stated. Its too bad that businesses don't compromise and restrict open carry but allow CC. That would cut down the idjits who do it as a status symbol with their MFT holstered 1911 clone with the imitation ivory grips but still allow someone the option to protect themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3333762, member: 43724"] I can understand the part about TactiCool Timmy's going around and compensating for their .22 derringer in their pants. And I have never said I want the business to NOT have the right to choose, rather I want them liable if that choice causes me to be injured due to an assault while on their property. All in all I won't say your argument is wrong, it isn't. I just feel there is an argument to be made that by putting up those signs the business creates an environment that is less safe. Ultimately, that would have to be decided by a court of law. In the mean time, again, I'm just left with one of the three options I've previously stated. Its too bad that businesses don't compromise and restrict open carry but allow CC. That would cut down the idjits who do it as a status symbol with their MFT holstered 1911 clone with the imitation ivory grips but still allow someone the option to protect themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Gun Free Zone Liability
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom