Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
H.R. 1093--The "BATFE Reform Act" Introduced
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Koshinn" data-source="post: 1562840" data-attributes="member: 18314"><p>The same argument could be made with possession of consensual child pornography. For example, all those high school kids sexting eachother. If kid A sends a picture of his or her genitals to kid B, kid A is guilty of possession and distribution of child pornography and B is guilty of possession. At what age is that ok? According to law, 17 yr olds doing that will most likely be branded sex offenders. So will 12 yr olds. This is consensual, kids doing it on their own.</p><p></p><p>Or hell, if kid A sends "obsecene" pictures, voluntarily, to an adult. The adult is possessing child porn, which is illegal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Should we restrict 1A rights in certain situations? Yeah I think so. Not very often, but there are situations. Then again, there is a material difference between saying something when no one is around and owning an object. It's just like how owning cocaine is illegal, even if it can be proven without a doubt that the owner has never sold cocaine, has no plans to sell cocaine, and has never taken cocaine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Koshinn, post: 1562840, member: 18314"] The same argument could be made with possession of consensual child pornography. For example, all those high school kids sexting eachother. If kid A sends a picture of his or her genitals to kid B, kid A is guilty of possession and distribution of child pornography and B is guilty of possession. At what age is that ok? According to law, 17 yr olds doing that will most likely be branded sex offenders. So will 12 yr olds. This is consensual, kids doing it on their own. Or hell, if kid A sends "obsecene" pictures, voluntarily, to an adult. The adult is possessing child porn, which is illegal. Should we restrict 1A rights in certain situations? Yeah I think so. Not very often, but there are situations. Then again, there is a material difference between saying something when no one is around and owning an object. It's just like how owning cocaine is illegal, even if it can be proven without a doubt that the owner has never sold cocaine, has no plans to sell cocaine, and has never taken cocaine. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
H.R. 1093--The "BATFE Reform Act" Introduced
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom