Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Handguns
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Junior Bonner" data-source="post: 2695124" data-attributes="member: 33416"><p>Well, I am going to step on the gas peddle and try to get through the rest of these Lugers so that I can start shooting the more powerful NATO. But the Beretta is so damned accurate. When I get a whole magazine on that sheet of paper at 75 feet, I feel like somebody!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Edit: Now, bigchuck83 if this is magazine related, I feel it is forgivable. But since the 92 series is what is issued to the military, they ought to be able to run cheap ammo as long as it is 9x19 - they ought to be able to shoot anything that is available in that caliber.</p><p></p><p>I like the Beretta because:</p><p></p><p>1. It is pretty.</p><p>2. It holds 18 rounds.</p><p>3. It is very, very accurate.</p><p></p><p>I no longer carry it because:</p><p></p><p>1. I don't trust it.</p><p></p><p>Soon as it's daylight, I'll tend to the chickens and go down below and run 17 through a different magazine. I take my time between shots so that I can tighten up that impact zone on the paper. I am not going to waste ammo just to rule out a problem. I am hoping it is not the ammo. Because if a military weapon can't cycle what's available...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Junior Bonner, post: 2695124, member: 33416"] Well, I am going to step on the gas peddle and try to get through the rest of these Lugers so that I can start shooting the more powerful NATO. But the Beretta is so damned accurate. When I get a whole magazine on that sheet of paper at 75 feet, I feel like somebody! Edit: Now, bigchuck83 if this is magazine related, I feel it is forgivable. But since the 92 series is what is issued to the military, they ought to be able to run cheap ammo as long as it is 9x19 - they ought to be able to shoot anything that is available in that caliber. I like the Beretta because: 1. It is pretty. 2. It holds 18 rounds. 3. It is very, very accurate. I no longer carry it because: 1. I don't trust it. Soon as it's daylight, I'll tend to the chickens and go down below and run 17 through a different magazine. I take my time between shots so that I can tighten up that impact zone on the paper. I am not going to waste ammo just to rule out a problem. I am hoping it is not the ammo. Because if a military weapon can't cycle what's available... [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Handguns
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom