Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Heller Cited in Upholding Discretionary Licensing for Concealed Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1533030" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p><a href="http://joshblackman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/RichardsvYolo.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Richards v. County of Yolo</em> (E.D. Cal.)</a></p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Under the statutory scheme, even if Plaintiffs are denied a concealed weapon license for self-defense purposes from Yolo County, they are still more than free to keep an unloaded weapon nearby their person, load it, and use it for self-defense in circumstances that may occur in a public setting. Yolo County’s policy does not substantially burden Plaintiffs’ right to bear and keep arms. Therefore, rational basis review applies.</p><p></p><p>^.^ I thought "rational basis review" required sound application of logic. Seriously, how do law schools who produce these types of products with no natural or artificial intelligence stay in business? (Then again, I guess you have to produce defectives to ensure job security for products that pass quality control. Still, they should at least assign serial numbers and issue periodic recalls.)</p><p></p><p>By the way, the "longstanding prohibitions" exception from <em>Heller</em> was used to support the ruling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1533030, member: 5151"] [URL="http://joshblackman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/RichardsvYolo.pdf"][I]Richards v. County of Yolo[/I] (E.D. Cal.)[/URL] [INDENT] Under the statutory scheme, even if Plaintiffs are denied a concealed weapon license for self-defense purposes from Yolo County, they are still more than free to keep an unloaded weapon nearby their person, load it, and use it for self-defense in circumstances that may occur in a public setting. Yolo County’s policy does not substantially burden Plaintiffs’ right to bear and keep arms. Therefore, rational basis review applies.[/INDENT] ^.^ I thought "rational basis review" required sound application of logic. Seriously, how do law schools who produce these types of products with no natural or artificial intelligence stay in business? (Then again, I guess you have to produce defectives to ensure job security for products that pass quality control. Still, they should at least assign serial numbers and issue periodic recalls.) By the way, the "longstanding prohibitions" exception from [I]Heller[/I] was used to support the ruling. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Heller Cited in Upholding Discretionary Licensing for Concealed Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom