Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here is an idea!!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 3085099" data-attributes="member: 5391"><p>So, in a rhetorical sense, I would ask YOU 'what part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?' It doesn't say the 'right of the people, except for those who are in prison, etc., it says the 'right of the people' period. This means all people regardless of their circumstances.</p><p></p><p>Obviously this might seem to some to be unrealistic, but what what the heck, right? After all, where does the constitution say that prisoners, etc, don't have the right to arms? </p><p></p><p>All right, I'll come back down to earth. The reality is that there are no rights that can't be taken away. You can lose your right to arms and there is a provision in the constitution for doing this.</p><p></p><p>Recognize this?</p><p></p><p>It is the Fifth Amendment. Now do we have a right to life? To liberty? To property? Of course we do. Can we lose them? Yes, if we are accorded due process. </p><p></p><p>Why can the government take these rights away from us and not the right to arms?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 3085099, member: 5391"] So, in a rhetorical sense, I would ask YOU 'what part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?' It doesn't say the 'right of the people, except for those who are in prison, etc., it says the 'right of the people' period. This means all people regardless of their circumstances. Obviously this might seem to some to be unrealistic, but what what the heck, right? After all, where does the constitution say that prisoners, etc, don't have the right to arms? All right, I'll come back down to earth. The reality is that there are no rights that can't be taken away. You can lose your right to arms and there is a provision in the constitution for doing this. Recognize this? It is the Fifth Amendment. Now do we have a right to life? To liberty? To property? Of course we do. Can we lose them? Yes, if we are accorded due process. Why can the government take these rights away from us and not the right to arms? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Here is an idea!!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom